Final round judging criteria
Each entry is judged on the criteria adopted by the Expert Committee meeting:
№
|
Judging criteria
|
|
|
Scoring system
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
-
How innovative and technologically advanced is the solution?
|
|
|
-
an innovative and authentic solution – 3 points
;
-
a new approach based on existing solutions – 2 points;
-
an optimization of a technique/approach/technology – 1 point
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
-
How important is the project for quality assurance in pharmaceutical manufacturing:
|
|
|
-
very important – 3 points;
-
fairly important – 2 points;
-
slightly important – 1 point
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
-
How elaborate and far reaching is it:
|
|
|
-
system-wide level – 3 points;
-
department-wide level – 2 points;
-
operating level – 1 point
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
-
How impactful has it been for the company’s management system (less man-hours, better management of interactions and interdependence in the system, and, as a result, improvement in overall organizational performance)? Has its economic efficiency been proven (lower costs, increased labor productivity and profits):
|
|
|
-
economic and organizational efficiency – 2 points;
-
economic efficiency – 1 point;
-
organizational efficiency – 1 point
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
-
How successful was the project presentation (speech, presentation and discussion):
|
|
|
-
very successful – 3 points;
-
moderately successful – 2 points;
-
unsuccessful – 1 point
|
|
|
|
|
|